Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/Today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion policies for the official rules of this page, and how to do cleanup.

Deletion of a category may mean that the articles and images in it are directly put in its parent category, or that another subdivision of the parent category is made. If they are already members of more suitable categories, it may also mean that they become a member of one category less.

How to use this page

[edit]
  1. Know if the category you are looking at needs deleting (or to be created). If it is a "red link" and has no articles or subcategories, then it is already deleted (more likely, it was never really created in the first place), and does not need to be listed here.
  2. Read and understand Wikipedia:Categorization before using this page. Nominate categories that violate policies here, or are misspelled, mis-capitalized, redundant/need to be merged, not NPOV, small without potential for growth, or are generally bad ideas. (See also Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.)
  3. Please read the Wikipedia:Categorization of people policy if nominating or voting on a people-related category.
  4. Unless the category to be deleted is non-controversial – vandalism or a duplicate, for example – please do not depopulate the category (remove the tags from articles) before the community has made a decision.
  5. Add {{cfd}} to the category page for deletion. (If you are recommending that the category be renamed, you may also add a note giving the suggested new name.) This will add a message to it, and also put the page you are nominating into Category:Categories for deletion. It's important to do this to help alert people who are watching or browsing the category.
    1. Alternately, use the rename template like this: {{cfr|newname}}
    2. If you are concerned with a stub category, make sure to inform the WikiProject Stub sorting
  6. Add new deletion candidates under the appropriate day near the top of this page.
    1. Alternatively, if the category is a candidate for speedy renaming (see Wikipedia:Category renaming), add it to the speedy category at the bottom.
  7. Make sure you add a colon (:) in the link to the category being listed, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes the category link a hard link which can be seen on the page (and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating).
  8. Sign any listing or vote you make by typing ~~~~ after your text.
  9. Link both categories to delete and categories to merge into. Failure to do this will delay consideration of your suggestion.

Special notes

[edit]

Some categories may be listed in Category:Categories for deletion but accidently not listed here.

Discussion for Today

[edit]
This page is transcluded from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025_February_9


February 9

[edit]

NEW NOMINATIONS

[edit]

Category:Princes of Scotland

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Pretty much the same category but named differently. I initially wanted to change it to match the article but discovered it already existed. Also will avoid confusion with Category:Scottish princes. Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:05, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A careful reading of the article reveals that (before the 14th century) there were Princes of Scotland who were not also Great/High Steward (and vice versa). Though it makes obvious sense for Prince and Great Steward of Scotland to be one article, I'm not yet convinced the categories can be merged wholesale. DBD 20:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:International airports by country

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 November 15#Category:International airports in India and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 November 15#Category:International airports. Gray eyes (talk) 15:27, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the rationale is weak to me (decisions from 14 years ago?) and I disagree with the idea that international airports aren't defining. I certainly don't want to have look through dozens of aerodromes to find international airports. Traumnovelle (talk) 05:37, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting per request.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 19:31, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Substack writers

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Substack is not a publication; it's a newsletter platform. This is like categorizing by webhost or email provider. Trivialist (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. This was debated previously. There has been a large recent influx (in 2025) of writers from New York Times and network news to the Substack platform. It is convenient to users of Wikipedia that they be identified.Kmccook (talk) 18:05, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sports events by month

[edit]
Month year categories
Nominator's rationale: Follow up of Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 14#Category:Events by month. In spirit of WP:C2C to align with Category:January by year, etc. and Category:Sport by period. –Aidan721 (talk) 14:51, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Government in Riverside, California

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Category is for a city with its own government. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 01:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also purge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:United States secretaries of the treasury

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: The Treasury refers to a proper noun. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 02:16, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, interestingly the article mentions this: "The department is customarily referred to as "Treasury", solely, without any preceding article – a transitional remnant from British to American English." I do not know if this is correct. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:44, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Responses to Marcocapelle's comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:05, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]